about the rural

On this time i will talk about of a subject that does not take much into account.
when the people talk about Georaphy, think about in the physical forms of the earth,or the formations that are present on the planet, because are different factors to make the aearth made like there is. But people, when we talk about Geography, dont think about the people in a a place.
Geography studies all the factor thar are present in a places, inlcuided the physisc and social. With social, I talk about the peolple, and how this people is organizated, in all terms.
A consideration when classifying the population is whether urban o rural. The definition varies by the country,  a place can be urban by politics, economics or tecnologic factors, and considerated the rural like the inverse of urban. The urban places are the citys, in Chile, urban are the places that are constituted by more than 2000 people, and the rural places are the places that the people are less than 2000 people.
Usually civility looks like progress is pointing the model to aspire in all countries, and people leave the rural side, thinking it is retrograde and undeveloped, but our roots are in the rural life, in the rural places lives are more fulfilling, stay away from Babylon, makes connecting with nature and watch things differently.
Im just now introducing the subject, to get an idea, and stop thinking that rural is synonymous with delay. The problem is missing rurality policies that encourage and support progress in these areas, without losing its rural identity, and that is why people, rural, migrate to the cities.
Progress is not synonymous to raze the nature, if not achieve live in our home, planet earth, in a healthy way, without damaging our collective and environment.
In my presentation, I hope to speak of rurality on our continent, and espceificar a bit, which is our country.

Bless!

(esta malo mi teclado, por eso no puedo poner apostrofe)